- Status
“Believe me?” This guy commented literally right after I replied to your post, lmfao.
I mean, are you two supposed to be going to school together?
Gaypeix: “Hey, this guy is still internet bullying me, come help me against him,” lmfao.
Gaypeix’s bf: “Okay baby, I’ll try my best and try not to embarrass you.”
of course you're gonna use ANYTHING to not continue talking lmao, you're so embarrassing it's crazy, obv you're gonna say that someone has a "gpt 4" sub because you wasted your parents money to buy gpt 5/claude for your p100 sensical paste
xdd, this is worse than saying "hand over your <fully public 2$ cheat> uid", subhuman bot with 0 knowledge about anything, a newfag paster shouldn't be having any perms to make a thread about his rat at all
First of all, the cheat has always been free, so the fact you couldn't even get that right tells me everything about how much "testing" you actually did.
I asked for your UID because you claim you used it before the CS2 update. Funny how someone with so much to say can't produce a single piece of proof. Almost like you never had it injected in the first place.
Come back when you can provide your UID instead of insults. Until then, you're just another zero-post nobody barking loud to compensate for having nothing to show.
1. First of all, the cheat has always been free, so the fact you couldn't even get that right tells me everything about how much "testing" you actually did. -
You must be registered for see links
2. I asked for your UID because you claim you used it before the CS2 update. Funny how someone with so much to say can't produce a single piece of proof. Almost like you never had it injected in the first place. - yes, i claimed that i used it before any cs2 update, because i DID, it did not have to be the latest version of your paste.
3. Come back when you can provide your UID instead of insults. Until then, you're just another zero-post nobody barking loud to compensate for having nothing to show. - yes saar i'll run your c++ai loader with a rat and come back with a meaningless uid. just because i have 0 posts doesn't mean i don't have anything to show, mr. bignamer. i don't need to post every single project i made. you think you're better than others because you made a thread on a pretty much dead forum..
- You called it a "$2 cheat" — it's free. That's not a reading comprehension issue on my end, that's you making things up. The Wikipedia link is cute though, maybe bookmark it for yourself.
- If you actually used it, dropping your UID takes 5 seconds. You've now spent more time writing essays about why you shouldn't have to prove it than it would've taken to just prove it.
- "I'll run your loader with a rat" — go ahead, reverse it. You'll find nothing because there's nothing to find. The fact that your go-to defense is accusing someone's project of being malware without evidence says everything.
Still waiting on that UID......
1. i compared your iqless sentence: "You’re supposed to hand over your Reev UID." to someone saying "hand over your uid for <public 2$ cheat>", both are meaningless. still waiting for that reading comprehension..
2. i didn't need to do any uid shit when i used your paste, so now you can say "you used an old version from 2023!!"
3. it's clearly sketchy for a free paste to require running a loader. i don't have to prove shit
few words = paragraphs, nice iq
few posts = alive forum, nice iq
i'm not convincing anyone that i have any projects? idc if someone believes me or not.
- "Both are meaningless" - one is asking you to verify a claim you made, the other is something a random person said. Not the same thing. You claimed you used it, I asked for proof. That's how it works.
- "I didn't need to do any UID shit" - every user who ran the loader got a UID automatically. You didn't need to "do" anything. If you used it, you have one. The fact you don't know that tells me everything.
- "Sketchy for a free paste to require a loader" — literally every cheat uses a loader. That's standard. If you think a loader = rat, you've never used a cheat in your life, which tracks with everything else you've said.
"I don't have to prove shit", Correct, you don't. But then don't claim you used something you clearly never touched. Simple as that.
And my favorite part: "few words = paragraphs, nice iq", you're the one who keeps replying with longer posts each time. "few posts = alive forum", you're contributing to the activity you're mocking. The irony writes itself. - my sentences are shorter than yours.. and i'm not mocking any activity?.. i'm stating that few posts don't make the forum alive.
- "Both are meaningless" - one is asking you to verify a claim you made, the other is something a random person said. Not the same thing. You claimed you used it, I asked for proof. That's how it works. - actually a pub cheat uid is more meaningful than having to prove an obviously true claim because of an ai addict.
- "I didn't need to do any UID shit" - every user who ran the loader got a UID automatically. You didn't need to "do" anything. If you used it, you have one. The fact you don't know that tells me everything. - every user who RAN the loader, i didn't use any version that had a loader, end of story about your dogshit cheat versions.
- "Sketchy for a free paste to require a loader" — literally every cheat uses a loader. That's standard. If you think a loader = rat, you've never used a cheat in your life, which tracks with everything else you've said. - reading comprehension demon strikes again.. it IS sketchy for a random free cheat with 0 history to require any potential users to run a loader.. you don't even have a basic website set up and you do your ai backend through a DISCORD BOT XDD, truly the essence of auth. you labeled your cheat as "for the community" while not publishing a safe version of the dll (without loader) with no network comm.
"I didn't use any version that had a loader" - so now the story changed from "I used it before the CS2 update" to "I used an ancient version that predates the loader." Convenient how the goalposts move every reply. Which version exactly? What features did it have? You keep getting vaguer instead of more specific, which is what happens when you're making it up as you go.
"AI addict" - You're on a forum arguing for an hour about a cheat you can't prove you ever used. We're not the same.
As for the loader criticism: authentication exists because people were taking the DLL and repackaging it under random loader names, when it could be injected with any LoadLibrary injector. That's not sketchy, that's basic software distribution. Discord bot handles auth because it works and it's free infrastructure - not everyone needs to burn money on a website to prove something to someone who calls a loader "malware" because he doesn't understand basic injection. And the DLL without the loader is the DLL - the loader just handles injection and auth. If you actually understood how any of this works, you'd know that.
"For the community" while requiring a loader - yes, free + authenticated. Those aren't contradictions. Steam is free and requires a login. Is Valve sketchy too?
You've gone from "your cheat is trash" to writing multi-paragraph architectural critiques of my auth pipeline. For something you supposedly don't care about, you sure have a lot of opinions.
"I didn't use any version that had a loader" - so now the story changed from "I used it before the CS2 update" to "I used an ancient version that predates the loader." Convenient how the goalposts move every reply. Which version exactly? What features did it have? You keep getting vaguer instead of more specific, which is what happens when you're making it up as you go. - retard in the full light. i used a version before the cs2 update that did not require a loader, like holy gosh you care about what version i used when it's still a goshing paste with empty features, get a life.
"AI addict" - You're on a forum arguing for an hour about a cheat you can't prove you ever used. We're not the same. - so are you, you're dick riding your own paste and defending it over your life.
authentication exists because people were taking the DLL and repackaging it under random loader names, when it could be injected with any LoadLibrary injector. That's not sketchy, that's basic software distribution. - who cares if people repackage it?.. literally a pointless statement, if you mean it for the safety of users, it still doesn't make sense since someone who runs a random cheat with the most basic lumma stealer inside is just natural selection.
User is currently banned.
just my 2 cents, you should you are comparing yourself to VALVE ? LoL . People doesn't usually download loaders and make authentications , or communications like this, you are using to load a goshing driver with communications like a rootkit, look what shit calls are you using lol
You must be registered for see links
ObRegisterCallbacks / ObUnRegisterCallbacks: You can deny access to basically everything and get "super-admin" and read/write , to start with
PsCreateSystemThread / PsTerminateSystemThread
KeDelayExecutionThread / KeWaitForSingleObject
( both are used handle management , so you're driver is safely loaded in the memory and mapped )
KeAcquireSpinLockRaiseToDpc / KeReleaseSpinLock
( you trigger a BSOD with these )
Last edited:
"I used a version that didn't require a loader" - sure, older versions existed without one. But you originally claimed you tested it before the CS2 update, which implies you were using a recent version. Now it turns out you were running some ancient build and never touched the latest release. So you've been talking shit about features you never actually tested. That's not criticism, that's guessing.
"Paste with empty features" - you just admitted you never used the version that had the actual features. You tested an early build with barely anything in it, and now you're judging the entire project off that? That's like reviewing a game based on the alpha and calling the full release trash LOL
"Dick riding my own paste" — it's called maintaining a project. You posted on my thread making claims you can't back up. I didn't come to you.
"Who cares if people repackage it" - the users who got infected care. Your take is literally "people who get malware deserve it" which is a wild stance for someone who just accused my loader of being a rat two posts ago. So repackaged malware is "natural selection" but my authenticated loader is sketchy? Make it make sense.
You never tested the current version, you can't speak to its features, and every reply just confirms you're arguing about something you have zero experience with. We're done here.
- Status
Similar threads
